Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: testperf-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance
Date: 2005-07-28 22:17:25
Message-ID: 20050728221725.GE26758@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 07:32:34PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > This 4-way has 8GB of memory and four Adaptec 2200s controllers attached
> > to 80 spindles (eight 10-disk arrays).  For those familiar with the
> > schema, here is a visual of the disk layout:
> > 	http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/layout-6.html

Have you by-chance tried it with the logs and data just going to
seperate RAID10s? I'm wondering if a large RAID10 would do a better job
of spreading the load than segmenting things to specific drives.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel(at)decibel(dot)org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-07-28 22:19:34
Subject: Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-07-28 22:14:41
Subject: Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group