| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | testperf-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance |
| Date: | 2005-07-28 22:17:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20050728221725.GE26758@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 07:32:34PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > This 4-way has 8GB of memory and four Adaptec 2200s controllers attached
> > to 80 spindles (eight 10-disk arrays). For those familiar with the
> > schema, here is a visual of the disk layout:
> > http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/layout-6.html
Have you by-chance tried it with the logs and data just going to
seperate RAID10s? I'm wondering if a large RAID10 would do a better job
of spreading the load than segmenting things to specific drives.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-07-28 22:19:34 | Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-07-28 22:14:41 | Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance |