Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Table Design Issue & PGSQL Performance

From: <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: KeithW(at)narrowpathinc(dot)com
Cc: Postgresql Mailing list <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Table Design Issue & PGSQL Performance
Date: 2005-07-28 19:07:30
Message-ID: 20050728190730.29535.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
keith and tom, thanks for the responses.  as per a
suggestion i received via email only, i think i will
be best served by creating a t_note_area table and
linking its primary key, note_area_id into the notes
table -> t_notes.note_area_id.

that way i get keith's benefit of full nomenclature
and i also don't have to limit myself by hardcoding
the area names.

i do exactly this for note_contact, but somehow i
wasn't thinking through this situation the way i
should have been.

thanks to everyone for getting me back on the right track.


		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2005-07-29 02:39:25
Subject: Re: Troubles with PL/Perl in PgSQL
Previous:From: Keith WorthingtonDate: 2005-07-28 18:47:30
Subject: Re: Table Design Issue & PGSQL Performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group