> I guess I'd be concerned that the poor bgwriter can't do all of this
> work. I was thinking about a separate log writer, so we could have both
> bgwriter and logwriter active simultaneously on I/O. It has taken a
> while to get bgwriter to perform its duties efficiently, so I'd rather
> not give it so many that it performs them all badly.
Speaking of which, now that I have a target value for wal_buffers, I want
to re-test the bgwriter. In my previous tests, varying the bgwriter
settings on DBT2 had no discernable effect.
Aglio Database Solutions
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2005-07-27 22:41:24|
|Subject: Re: VACUUM DATABASE|
|Previous:||From: Larry Rosenman||Date: 2005-07-27 22:38:46|
|Subject: Sanity Check?|