Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RES: [IMPORTANT] - My application performance

From: "Alvaro Neto" <alvaro(dot)neto(at)conab(dot)gov(dot)br>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RES: [IMPORTANT] - My application performance
Date: 2005-07-26 21:00:52
Message-ID: 20050726210052.AB1294C0C7@dfbsa63.conab.gov.br (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
What's the your platform?  Windows or Linux?
What's the data volume (up million records)?

-----Mensagem original-----
De: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] Em nome de Roberto Germano
Vieweg Neto
Enviada em: terça-feira, 26 de julho de 2005 16:35
Para: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Assunto: [PERFORM] [IMPORTANT] - My application performance

My application is using Firebird 1.5.2

I have at my database:
- 150 Doamins
- 318 tables
- 141 Views
- 365 Procedures
- 407 Triggers
- 75 generators
- 161 Exceptions
- 183 UDFs
- 1077 Indexes

My question is:

Postgre SQL will be more faster than Firebird? How much (in percent)?

I need about 20% to 50% more performance at my application.
Can I get this migratin to postgresql ?


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2005-07-26 22:12:10
Subject: Re: Cheap RAM disk?
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-07-26 20:05:00
Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] - My application performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group