Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: VACUUM DATABASE

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM DATABASE
Date: 2005-07-26 20:53:58
Message-ID: 20050726205358.GA18604@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:30:20PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> 
> I'd like to suggest altering the syntax of VACUUM so that it is possible
> to issue the command VACUUM DATABASE. The keyword DATABASE would be
> optional, to allow backward compatibility.

Huh, so why not have an optional LAZY?

I understand your concern against "VACUUM LAZY table", which is not
helpful -- so your advice would have to be rephrased as "issue a
database-wide lazy vacuum"

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Saca el libro que tu religión considere como el indicado para encontrar la
oración que traiga paz a tu alma. Luego rebootea el computador
y ve si funciona" (Carlos Duclós)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2005-07-26 20:56:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Chris TraversDate: 2005-07-26 20:53:54
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group