Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [IMPORTANT] - My application performance

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Roberto Germano Vieweg Neto <beto(dot)neto(at)pop(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] - My application performance
Date: 2005-07-26 20:05:00
Message-ID: 20050726200500.GY29346@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
The number of objects in your system has virtually nothing to do with
performance (at least on any decent database...)

What is your application doing? What's the bottleneck right now?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 04:35:19PM -0300, Roberto Germano Vieweg Neto wrote:
> My application is using Firebird 1.5.2
> 
> I have at my database:
> - 150 Doamins
> - 318 tables
> - 141 Views
> - 365 Procedures
> - 407 Triggers
> - 75 generators
> - 161 Exceptions
> - 183 UDFs
> - 1077 Indexes
> 
> My question is:
> 
> Postgre SQL will be more faster than Firebird? How much (in percent)?
> 
> I need about 20% to 50% more performance at my application.
> Can I get this migratin to postgresql ?
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
> 

-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel(at)decibel(dot)org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Alvaro NetoDate: 2005-07-26 21:00:52
Subject: RES: [IMPORTANT] - My application performance
Previous:From: Richard_D_LevineDate: 2005-07-26 20:02:01
Subject: Re: Cheap RAM disk?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group