Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: COPY FROM performance improvements

From: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Alon Goldshuv <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, maryedie(at)osdl(dot)org
Subject: Re: COPY FROM performance improvements
Date: 2005-07-22 16:49:05
Message-ID: 20050722164905.GE18413@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patchespgsql-performance
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:19:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Joshua,
> 
> On 7/21/05 7:53 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Well I know that isn't true at least not with ANY of the Dells my
> > customers have purchased in the last 18 months. They are still really,
> > really slow.
> 
> That's too bad, can you cite some model numbers?  SCSI?

I would be interested too, given

   http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=30531


Cheers,

Patrick

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-07-22 17:11:25
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] COPY FROM performance improvements
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-07-22 16:20:20
Subject: Re: Planner doesn't look at LIMIT?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-07-22 17:11:25
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] COPY FROM performance improvements
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-07-22 16:22:52
Subject: Re: Writing Commit Status hint bits (was Re: [HACKERS] Constant

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group