Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated
Date: 2005-07-21 21:38:10
Message-ID: 20050721213810.GK24207@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Yeah, let's take a look. This wouldn't be the first part of the spec
> we've come across that is mostly honored in the breach...

Oracle appears to mostly follow it, except there's an implicit
'SET ROLE all;', at least in the instance I'm looking at. I'm guessing
it's probably something which is tunable. We don't currently have a way
of having certain roles turned on and certain ones turned off for a
given session. That doesn't seem like it'd be a very hard thing to add
though. I have to apologize for not realizing this sooner and
implementing it correctly the first time, sorry about that..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-21 21:45:14 Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-21 21:24:14 Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-21 21:45:14 Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-21 21:24:14 Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated