It looks like bug 1473
causing octopus to fail
I suspect I can change config options or what-not to make the build
work, but I'm not sure if that would just be masking something that's
actually a problem.
Is this still considered a bug? Should I leave octopus as-is or try and
fix my configuration?
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Bennett, Steve||Date: 2005-07-07 20:30:58|
|Subject: Re: BUG #1757: timestamp 'epoch' is not absolute |
|Previous:||From: Matthew T. O'Connor||Date: 2005-07-07 20:23:04|
|Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum: short, wide tables|