Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump
Date: 2005-06-28 20:33:16
Message-ID: 20050628203316.GB22107@surnet.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:24:19PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> I *think* that's easy enough to do in time for 8.1. Trivial patch
> attached. I hope it's enough :-) It passed my very quick testing...
> 
> (Yup, I read the mails aobut PGCLIENTENCODING, but an option to pg_dump
> is certainly easier)

You forgot to document the long option, I think.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"No necesitamos banderas
 No reconocemos fronteras"                  (Jorge González)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2005-06-28 20:37:54
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Previous:From: Michael PaesoldDate: 2005-06-28 20:31:00
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2005-06-28 20:37:54
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Previous:From: Michael PaesoldDate: 2005-06-28 20:31:00
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group