Re: Occupied port warning

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Occupied port warning
Date: 2005-06-28 14:04:58
Message-ID: 200506281604.58862.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> see http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-03/msg00679.php

Well, with once release of field experience behind me I'd like to
revisit this idea. Who would actually be hurt by generating an error
here like it used to do?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-06-28 14:10:07 Re: Occupied port warning
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-06-28 14:02:52 Re: Occupied port warning