| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ben-Nes Yonatan <da(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Populating huge tables each day |
| Date: | 2005-06-27 19:58:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20050627195800.GW89438@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:43:57PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
> I see a lot of problems with this idea.
>
> You mention that the database is supposed to be available 24x7.
> While you are loading, the database table receiving data will not be
> available. Therefore, you will have to have one server online (with
Why do you think that's the case?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-06-27 20:05:42 | Re: Populating huge tables each day |
| Previous Message | Uwe C. Schroeder | 2005-06-27 19:50:06 | Re: Finding points within 50 miles |