Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Querying 19million records very slowly

From: Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>
To: Kjell Tore Fossbakk <kjelltore(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Querying 19million records very slowly
Date: 2005-06-22 08:39:21
Message-ID: 20050622083921.GZ7839@tobias (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
[Kjell Tore Fossbakk - Wed at 10:18:30AM +0200]
> I'll test the use of current_timestamp, rather than now(). I am not
> sure if Pg can do a match between a fixed timestamp and a datetime?

I have almost all my experience with timestamps wo timezones, but ... isn't
that almost the same as the timedate type?

> time > current_timestamp - interval '24 hours',
> when time is yyyy-mm-dd hh-mm-ss+02, like 2005-06-22 16:00:00+02.

Try to type in '2005-06-21 16:36:22+08' directly in the query, and see if it
makes changes.  Or probably '2005-06-21 10:36:22+02' in your case ;-)

(btw, does postgresql really handles timezones?  '+02' is quite different
from 'CET', which will be obvious sometime in the late autoumn...)

-- 
Tobias Brox, +86-13521622905
Nordicbet, IT dept

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2005-06-22 08:55:35
Subject: Re: Querying 19million records very slowly
Previous:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2005-06-22 08:30:51
Subject: Re: Configurator project launched

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group