Re: default database creation with initdb

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: default database creation with initdb
Date: 2005-06-18 13:27:49
Message-ID: 200506180927.50411.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Saturday 18 June 2005 04:55, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Umm. Tiny item, but your comment still refers to the database as
> > pg_system ;-)
> >

What is the purpose of this database? A generalized, shared resource for tool
makers and add-on packages to store information in PostgreSQL, or a working
database that is usable (and to be used) out of the box for new users? I
really don't think we want the latter... I can see users connecting via psql
and then playing around with different add/create type statements. It is all
too common a question from newbies... "does postgresql have a default
database to get started with?" They'll see this database and begin creating
schema and using this as thier main database, and I think we ought to avoid
that. If people don't like pg_system, pg_addons seem like a much safer name
to go with imho.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-06-18 13:31:11 Re: Returning Composite Types from C functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-18 13:26:50 Re: LGPL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-18 13:33:19 Re: default database creation with initdb
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-06-18 08:55:21 Re: default database creation with initdb