--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Himanshu Baweja <himanshubaweja(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > "SELECT pg_stat_get_db_blocks_fetched(764755937),
> > pg_stat_get_db_blocks_hit(764755937);"
> > gives be constantly increasing stats and
> > "SELECT relname,heap_blks_read from
> > pg_statio_user_tables order by heap_blks_read DESC
> > LIMIT 15;"
> > is still showing me all zero 4 mins into the test
> > until i first vacuum analyze is done....
> Um, looking at the view definition, heap_blks_read
> is the *difference*
> between blocks_fetched and blocks_hit ... is it
> possible your test is
> testing a 100%-cached situation, such that those two
> numbers increase
> in lockstep?
> regards, tom lane
both blocks fetched and block reads are zero... had
already checked for that.... => block hit is also
any ideas now...
Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gevik babakhani||Date: 2005-06-03 17:12:00|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer Network|
|Previous:||From: Alon Goldshuv||Date: 2005-06-03 16:57:00|
|Subject: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?|