On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:30:01AM -0400, Alon Goldshuv wrote:
> before that, let me just clarify that the performance improvements in
> the patch have nothing to do with the escaping mechanizm. Escapes
> could change. The performance gain in due to a buffered processing
> with minimal line/attribute buffer loads.
May I suggest you present them as separate issues and separate patches?
This way, a patch with the performance improvements is very likely to
get merged; simultaneously we can discuss changes to the escaping
mechanism until everyone agrees (or not) and then produce a patch as
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
Este mail se entrega garantizadamente 100% libre de sarcasmo.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-06-02 06:00:17|
|Subject: Drop separate CRC32 implementations in ltree, tsearch, tsearch2?|
|Previous:||From: Luke Lonergan||Date: 2005-06-02 05:16:34|
|Subject: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?|