| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql backslash consistency |
| Date: | 2005-05-28 16:51:23 |
| Message-ID: | 200505281251.23879.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Saturday 28 May 2005 11:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> > I'm not against the idea of a config variable, but this is what, the
> > third or fourth go around on this? It seems rather unfair to put this
> > burden upon the current patch writer at this stage of the game...
>
> The fact that objections keep being raised should suggest to you that
> the idea is not uncontroversial. I think it's necessary to look for a
> compromise that everyone can live with. You're really wasting your
> breath to repeat the same arguments over and over and expect that
> anyone's mind will change.
>
I haven't heard a new objection yet that was discussed the previous several go
arounds, and yet here we are adding yet another precondition...
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-28 17:03:52 | Re: [HACKERS] patches for items from TODO list |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-28 16:03:38 | Re: hash index work |