Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > > I see hardly any use case for showing only user-defined functions
> > > or types by default. I think consistency is not necessarily
> > > desirable here.
> > See the archives for previous discussion and/or use cases.
> I didn't find any. Nevertheless, while there are undoubtedly some uses
> for everything, making this the default behavior does not seem
I think the logical issue is that a database with no user tables is
useless/empty, so showing only user tables makes sense, while a database
with no user functions is still useful, and in fact I would think most
databases have no user functions.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2005-05-27 21:14:57|
|Subject: Re: psql backslash consistency|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-05-27 20:16:15|
|Subject: Re: psql backslash consistency |