Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Select performance vs. mssql

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Date: 2005-05-25 00:20:39
Message-ID: 20050525002039.GA27519@mathom.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:35:14PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>Pretty much.  There has been discussion about allowing index-only access to 
>"frozen" tables, i.e. archive partitions.  But it all sort of hinges on 
>someone implementing it and testing ....

Is there any way to expose the planner estimate? For some purposes it's
enough to just give a rough ballpark (e.g., a google-esque "results 1-10
of approximately 10000000") so a user knows whether its worth even
starting to page through.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: John A MeinelDate: 2005-05-25 00:38:08
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Previous:From: PFCDate: 2005-05-25 00:14:01
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group