Re: Access 2000 bitching... "The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempte

From: Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Peter Bense <ptbense(at)gwm(dot)sc(dot)edu>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Access 2000 bitching... "The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempte
Date: 2005-05-17 15:14:12
Message-ID: 20050517151412.99451.qmail@web20821.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

--- Peter Bense <ptbense(at)gwm(dot)sc(dot)edu> wrote:
> I'm not at work right now so don't have the exact
> details available,
> BUT...
>
> 1. I am not using check boxes.

I asked about that, because the error you saw
frequently comes up with check boxes. So, if you are
not using check boxes, how are the boolean fields
being displayed/edited?

> 2. When I insert data into the table via PSQL it
> displays fine in the
> view itself. The error occurs when I try to insert.
> The user does have
> all the necessary privileges, etc. I have verified
> that part about 10
> times.
> 3. I have not changed any of the odbc settings (as
> you mention) from
> their default values.

Try setting "true is -1" to true. I believe that
option was introduced specifically as an Access
compatibility switch.

>
> ./peter
>
> Peter T. Bense - Teradata Certified Professional
> (ptbense(at)gwm(dot)sc(dot)edu) - 803-777-9476
> Database Administrator/Webmaster
> Prevention Research Center
> University of South Carolina
> >>> Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com>
> 05/16/05 4:47 PM >>>
>
> --- Peter Bense <Ptbense(at)gwm(dot)sc(dot)edu> wrote:
> > I am getting a
> >
> > "The field is too small to accept the amount of
> data
> > you attempted to
> > add" postgresql error when attempting to enter
> data
> > into the following
> > linked table in MS-Access. Nothing seems to be
> out
> > of range. Any
> > ideas?:
>
> I assume you are using check boxes? This has been a
> frequently encountered problem for Access users.
>
> I adopted a specific workaround a while ago, then
> forgot about the problem. But before I recommend
> that
> workaround, let's make sure that time has not
> revealed
> a better way. What are your driver settings for
> "bools as char" and "true is -1"?
>
> >
> > CREATE TABLE tblpis_survey_receipt (
> > insertion SERIAL,
> > ppt_id INT4 NOT NULL,
> > date_received DATE NOT NULL,
> > staff_id INT4 NOT NULL,
> > survey_type INT2 NOT NULL,
> > is_blank BOOL NOT NULL,
> > birth_month INT2,
> > birth_year INT2,
> > check_ppt BOOL NOT NULL,
> > check_dob BOOL NOT NULL,
> > check_tracking BOOL NOT NULL,
> > date_inserted TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE NOT
> > NULL,
> > date_modified TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE NOT
> > NULL,
> > PRIMARY KEY (insertion)
> > );
> >
> >
> > Peter T. Bense - Teradata Certified Professional
> > (ptbense(at)gwm(dot)sc(dot)edu) - 803-777-9476
> > Database Administrator/Webmaster
> > Prevention Research Center
> > University of South Carolina
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the
> > unregister command
> > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to
> > majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> >
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail Mobile
> Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your
> mobile phone.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose
> an index scan if
> your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>


Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message HaMaD H 2005-05-17 15:32:56 CrAz88Girz (^_^)
Previous Message Cris Carampa 2005-05-17 15:03:30 binary version of 08.00.0101 driver with bug 1262 fixed