Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?
Date: 2005-05-05 19:13:56
Message-ID: 200505052113.57362.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Although I dislike last-minute fixes, I am strongly tempted to put in
> the ignore-datallowconn-if-standalone change in all the releases we
> are about to make.

That sounds very reasonable.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 19:56:46 Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 18:19:15 Re: A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-05 19:21:04 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-05-05 19:12:53 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement