Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Date: 2005-04-28 01:22:32
Message-ID: 200504280122.j3S1MWr06823@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > There is a fairly lengthy discussion going on right now on the bizgres
> > mailing list about this topic, if your interested in helping out you
> > might want to join that list.
>
> What's the point of keeping such backend development discussion separate
> from the -hackers list? It's always been a mistake in the past...

That was my impression too.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-04-28 01:43:09 Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-04-28 01:16:47 Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?