Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Cleaning up unreferenced table files

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cleaning up unreferenced table files
Date: 2005-04-27 18:53:41
Message-ID: 200504271853.j3RIrfO07131@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I think we do need the patch, at least to find out if there is an issue
> > we don't know about.
> 
> My point is that we won't find out anything, because we will have no
> idea if people are noticing the log entries at all, much less telling
> us about 'em.  Of course if they do tell us then we'd know something,
> but what I am expecting is a vast silence.  We will not be able to tell
> the difference between "no problem" and "very infrequent problem" any
> better than we can now.

I think people do look at their logs.  We are certainly better off
finding it than having no reporting at all.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-27 23:05:40
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [WIP] shared locks
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-27 17:37:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group