Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Date: 2005-04-26 00:39:16
Message-ID: 200504260039.j3Q0dG602675@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I think everyone agrees this should only work in interactive mode.  I
> > think the only unknown is if it should be 'on' by default in interactive
> > mode?  Does it make sense to follow the standard in interactive mode if
> > we don't follow it in non-interative mode?
> 
> I doubt it's a good idea to change the default for this at all; in
> particular, making the default interactive behavior different from
> the noninteractive behavior seems like a recipe for problems.

Agreed.  New patch attached.  I will apply tomorrow.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-04-26 01:34:50
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-25 22:26:57
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group