Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Date: 2005-04-26 00:39:16
Message-ID: 200504260039.j3Q0dG602675@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I think everyone agrees this should only work in interactive mode. I
> > think the only unknown is if it should be 'on' by default in interactive
> > mode? Does it make sense to follow the standard in interactive mode if
> > we don't follow it in non-interative mode?
>
> I doubt it's a good idea to change the default for this at all; in
> particular, making the default interactive behavior different from
> the noninteractive behavior seems like a recipe for problems.

Agreed. New patch attached. I will apply tomorrow.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 4.9 KB

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-04-26 01:34:50 Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-25 22:26:57 Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql