Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
Date: 2005-04-24 22:54:29
Message-ID: 200504242254.j3OMsTo03707@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-docs
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
> > Should the text include a mention of synchronous vs. asynchronous? Or
> > does master-master imply synchronous?
> 
> It shouldn't. It is possible to have synchronous replication without it
> being master<->master.

We could mention async vs sync but at the FAQ stage I think the
multi-master/master-slave disinction is enough. Let's see what questions
we get.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Mischa SandbergDate: 2005-04-24 23:15:06
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-04-24 18:40:50
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Mischa SandbergDate: 2005-04-24 23:15:06
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
Previous:From: User AndrewsnDate: 2005-04-24 20:04:32
Subject: newsysviews - newsysview: build cleanup

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group