Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> My guess is that the FILLFACTOR will actually be a GUC variable rather
> >> than a clause to CREATE INDEX or REINDEX or CLUSTER.
> > I hope not, but it would be easier to set like that and a lot easier to
> > code up that way.
> I don't like that either. It seems highly unlikely that every table in
> a database would need the same fillfactor. It should be a per-table
> attribute, maybe with a DB-wide default, much like we handle per-column
> statistics targets.
That is fine. I just don't want to add the FILLFACTOR clause to several
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2005-04-20 13:58:59|
|Subject: Re: FW: Implementation of SQLSTATE and SQLERRM variables|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-04-20 13:42:55|
|Subject: Re: COPY Fillfactor patch |