Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables
Date: 2005-04-19 14:35:49
Message-ID: 200504191435.j3JEZnL04114@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Guys, is this patch ready for application? I think so, but am not 100%
> > sure.
>
> I haven't read the code yet, but in any case I still object to choosing
> Oracle-like names for Oracle-incompatible functionality. We need to
> settle on better names.

OK, are the values returned not the same as the Oracle values? If they
aren't, you are right, we need another name.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-19 14:37:00 Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-19 14:34:54 Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-19 14:37:00 Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-19 14:34:54 Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables