Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Compressing WAL

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Compressing WAL
Date: 2005-04-05 04:04:57
Message-ID: 20050405040457.GK93835@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Maybe better for -hackers, but here it goes anyway...

Has anyone looked at compressing WAL's before writing to disk? On a
system generating a lot of WAL it seems there might be some gains to be
had WAL data could be compressed before going to disk, since today's
machines are generally more I/O bound than CPU bound. And unlike the
base tables, you generally don't need to read the WAL, so you don't
really need to worry about not being able to quickly scan through the
data without decompressing it.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel(at)decibel(dot)org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Christopher PetrilliDate: 2005-04-05 04:16:27
Subject: Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-05 03:57:40
Subject: Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-04-05 04:11:53
Subject: Re: DELETE ... USING
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2005-04-05 03:55:32
Subject: Re: PgFoundry.org busted?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group