On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:08:54PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Quoting Tom Lane:
> > I thought the "S" suggestion was much better than this.
> > Personally I am not unhappy with the existing behavior, because (unlike
> > Greg I guess) I use \df and \do to look at system definitions all the
> > time. However I'm willing to accept \dfS on the grounds of symmetry
> > with the behavior for tables. I don't really want to put up with a less
> > convenient behavior *and* a gratuitously different syntax.
FWIW, the pg_sysview project is doing user and all variants of system
views, ie: pg_user_tables and pg_all_tables. I also wish there was a way
to get just user functions. I like the idea of \dfS, and if you also
wanted to be able to see all functions listed together, a \dfA (for all)
doesn't seem unreasonable.
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira||Date: 2005-04-04 01:03:35|
|Subject: Re: Recursive SQL|
|Previous:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2005-04-04 00:50:14|
|Subject: Re: psql and mysql|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-04-04 04:35:02|
|Subject: Re: unused variable ShmemBootstrap|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-04-03 17:13:09|
|Subject: Re: Transitive Closure and 'pg_inherits' |