Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql and mysql

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: jcradock(at)me3(dot)com
Cc: YL <elim(at)pdtnetworks(dot)net>,Psql_General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql and mysql
Date: 2005-04-04 00:50:14
Message-ID: 20050404005014.GW53309@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 06:23:56PM -0500, jcradock(at)me3(dot)com wrote:
> Clients aside, and as Christopher wrote, there are lots of differences
> between the two systems. PostgreSQL supports higher-end Enterprise-level
> RDBMS features. MySQL tends to be quicker. For example, and as just one

MySQL is generally only quicker if you don't care about your data
(MyISAM tables) and if you aren't hitting it with multiple clients.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel(at)decibel(dot)org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-04-04 00:59:21
Subject: Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-04-04 00:41:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-04 00:54:12
Subject: Re: Empty date
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-04-04 00:41:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group