Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,"Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 00:41:51
Message-ID: 20050404004151.GV53309@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:29:02AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> This argument doesn't hold too much weight. Namely because there are only
> 3-5 really popular languages out there. They are marketing languages.
> The are languages you include because your database doesn't "sound"
> complete with out them. Regardless if you can download them separately.
> People are lazy. They don't want to download them separately.
> 
> I see those as:
> 
> plPgsql (for Oracle people)
> plPerl
> plPHP

What databases support perl or php stored procs/functions? Or python for
that matter?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel(at)decibel(dot)org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-04-04 00:50:14
Subject: Re: psql and mysql
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-03 17:13:09
Subject: Re: Transitive Closure and 'pg_inherits'

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-04-04 00:50:14
Subject: Re: psql and mysql
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2005-04-03 23:46:06
Subject: Re: Strange plpgsql performance, diff plperl and plpgsql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group