From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Date: | 2005-04-04 00:41:51 |
Message-ID: | 20050404004151.GV53309@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:29:02AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> This argument doesn't hold too much weight. Namely because there are only
> 3-5 really popular languages out there. They are marketing languages.
> The are languages you include because your database doesn't "sound"
> complete with out them. Regardless if you can download them separately.
> People are lazy. They don't want to download them separately.
>
> I see those as:
>
> plPgsql (for Oracle people)
> plPerl
> plPHP
What databases support perl or php stored procs/functions? Or python for
that matter?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-04 00:50:14 | Re: psql and mysql |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-04-03 23:46:06 | Re: Strange plpgsql performance, diff plperl and plpgsql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-04 00:50:14 | Re: psql and mysql |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-03 17:13:09 | Re: Transitive Closure and 'pg_inherits' |