Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Actually as I think about it... that is not the case even now. When
> we download the php source the base configure before compile is:
>
> ./configure --disable-all
>
> Thus no use of PostgreSQL whatsoever.

I'm sure it is possible to get around it manually, but think about 
distributors.  They probably compile PHP more to the tunes of 
--enable-everything.  I don't think they will like it if we tell them 
that they need to switch to a two-stage build process or something.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

• Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? at 2005-04-02 17:32:47 from Joshua D. Drake

Responses

• Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? at 2005-04-02 23:32:58 from Joshua D. Drake

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Marc G. Fournier	Date: 2005-04-02 19:20:48
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous:	From: Joshua D. Drake	Date: 2005-04-02 17:32:47
	Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Marc G. Fournier	Date: 2005-04-02 19:20:48
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous:	From: Christopher Browne	Date: 2005-04-02 18:17:22
	Subject: Re: Disk Encryption - Postgresql vs. Oracle