Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-02 07:46:50
Message-ID: 200504020946.51002.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> The point here is really that we keep finding reasons to, if not
> flat-out change the interface to PLs, at least expand their
> responsibilities.  Not to push it too hard, but we still have only
> one PL with a validator procedure, which IIRC was your own addition
> to that API.  How come they don't all have validators?

Point taken.  The reason was, as explained the other day, that before 
the arrival of the "trigger" pseudotype it was not really possible to 
implement that in some cases.  But I plan to follow up on that now.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2005-04-02 09:54:51
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Qingqing ZhouDate: 2005-04-02 07:19:17
Subject: Re: invalidating cached plans

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2005-04-02 09:54:51
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-02 06:31:13
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group