Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-02 05:41:04
Message-ID: 200504020741.05675.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> PLs are sufficiently tightly tied to the core that it's probably
> easier to maintain them as part of our core CVS than otherwise.
> (Ask Joe Conway about PL/R.

As a matter of fact, let's ask him.

> Thomas Hallgren is probably not that 
> happy about maintaining pl/java out of core, either.

And let's ask him, too.

I'm not convinced that PLs are more tied to the core than say OpenFTS, 
and if we can't maintain that kind of thing externally, then this whole 
extension thing sounds like a failure to me.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2005-04-02 05:50:54
Subject: Re: Debugging deadlocks
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-04-02 05:38:19
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2005-04-02 05:50:54
Subject: Re: Debugging deadlocks
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-04-02 05:38:19
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group