Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-02 06:13:30
Message-ID: 20050402021121.D18194@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I'm not convinced that PLs are more tied to the core than say OpenFTS, 
> and if we can't maintain that kind of thing externally, then this whole 
> extension thing sounds like a failure to me.

As many times as Peter and I butt heads, on this I have to agree ... we're 
an "extensible database that requires the extensions to be in core" is 
effectively what is being said, which kinda defeats the 'extensible' 
nature ...


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-04-02 06:19:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-02 06:09:25
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-04-02 06:19:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-02 06:09:25
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group