Re: Segfault in 8.0.2beta1

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Segfault in 8.0.2beta1
Date: 2005-04-01 23:03:53
Message-ID: 20050401230353.GA8284@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:46:10PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Mumble ... that patch I put in last week doesn't work at all, does it?
> Back to the drawing board.

I don't get the crash any more with the change you applied a little
while ago. Here's a test case that was crashing:

CREATE TABLE foo (
id serial PRIMARY KEY,
first_date date NOT NULL,
last_date date NOT NULL
);

CREATE INDEX foo_dates_idx ON foo (first_date, last_date);

INSERT INTO foo (first_date, last_date) VALUES ('2005-04-01', '2005-04-02');
INSERT INTO foo (first_date, last_date) VALUES ('2005-04-02', '2005-04-03');
INSERT INTO foo (first_date, last_date) VALUES ('2005-04-03', '2005-04-04');
INSERT INTO foo (first_date, last_date) VALUES ('2005-04-04', '2005-04-05');

ANALYZE foo;

SELECT * FROM foo WHERE first_date <= now() AND last_date >= now();
id | first_date | last_date
----+------------+------------
1 | 2005-04-01 | 2005-04-02
(1 row)

And now back to the "date - range" thread in pgsql-performance,
which is why I was looking at this in the first place....

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl Denninger 2005-04-02 03:14:40 BUG in pg_autovacuum - with patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-01 19:46:10 Re: Segfault in 8.0.2beta1