Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: add_missing_from in 8.1

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: add_missing_from in 8.1
Date: 2005-04-01 06:11:12
Message-ID: 200504010611.j316BCM25049@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Wow, seems I lost that somehow.
> 
> BTW, I personally think it is fine for patch submitters to send "ping" 
> mails if your patch is not applied or reviewed within a reasonable 
> period of time --  this is standard practice among the GCC community, 
> for example. I certainly have a tendency to lose track of the status of 
> the various outstanding patches.

Agreed, but I shouldn't have lost it.  They shouldn't _need_ to ping,
and if they do, I hope I can saw we have it, rather than I don't.  :-(

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-04-01 06:27:32
Subject: Re: add_missing_from in 8.1
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-04-01 06:06:29
Subject: Re: add_missing_from in 8.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group