From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
Date: | 2005-04-01 05:08:21 |
Message-ID: | 200504010508.j3158LK06600@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> We could fix it by changing <> to IS DISTINCT FROM ... but I've never
> >> been very happy with the idea that \df tries to suppress I/O functions
> >> anyway. How do you feel about removing the cstring test altogether?
>
> > I like the cstring test. I don't think users want to see functions they
> > can't call from SQL, and they will ask about them if we show them.
>
> What makes you think you can't call 'em from SQL?
>
> regression=# select int4in('345');
> int4in
> --------
> 345
> (1 row)
Yes, I guess I mean does it make sense to call them from SQL? Their
purpose is for internal use, no?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | elein | 2005-04-01 05:19:35 | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-01 04:59:43 | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | elein | 2005-04-01 05:19:35 | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-01 04:59:43 | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |