Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Date: 2005-03-23 23:28:28
Message-ID: 200503240028.28973.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> There is no "ANSI SQL". Only ISO SQL. ANSI never issued their own
> spec to my knowledge ... unlike, say, C, where I believe ANSI C was
> in fact issued by ANSI.

There is an ANSI SQL standard ANSI X3.135. At least my copy of SQL 1999
carries a combined ANSI/ISO label. Nevertheless, referring to ISO
seems more appropriate.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-23 23:32:38 Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Previous Message Roy Badami 2005-03-23 23:26:48 Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,