Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Prevent conflicting SET options from being set

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prevent conflicting SET options from being set
Date: 2005-03-23 00:37:07
Message-ID: 200503230037.j2N0b7N11132@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> 
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes
> >
> > We already have the ability to issue custom messages in assign_hooks,
> > and I think that's sufficient in practice.
> 
> Yes, I agree this is already sufficient - seems we need to remove that TODO
> item in the list.

Removed.  I think we have all the conflicting options fixed already:

<       o Prevent conflicting SET options from being set
<
<         This requires a checking function to be called after the server
<         configuration file is read.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-03-23 01:30:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] what to do with backend flowchart
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-03-23 00:07:23
Subject: Re: odd problem !

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group