Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes
> > We already have the ability to issue custom messages in assign_hooks,
> > and I think that's sufficient in practice.
> Yes, I agree this is already sufficient - seems we need to remove that TODO
> item in the list.
Removed. I think we have all the conflicting options fixed already:
< o Prevent conflicting SET options from being set
< This requires a checking function to be called after the server
< configuration file is read.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-03-23 01:30:14|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] what to do with backend flowchart|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-03-23 00:07:23|
|Subject: Re: odd problem ! |