Re: BUG #1514: Inheritance and Primary Keys

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Peter Newman <pnewman(at)wanadoo(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1514: Inheritance and Primary Keys
Date: 2005-03-07 04:22:22
Message-ID: 20050307042222.GA23449@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:23:27PM +0000, Peter Newman wrote:

> So my point is (if it is not clear) that the primary key constraint is not
> enforced through subclass tables. Is this intentional?

It's a documented limitation of the current implementation. Here's
an excerpt from the "Inheritance" section of the "Data Definition"
chapter of the documentation:

A limitation of the inheritance feature is that indexes (including
unique constraints) and foreign key constraints only apply to
single tables, not to their inheritance children.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/ddl-inherit.html

Fixing inheritance limitations is on the developers' TODO list --
it's just a matter of somebody deciding it's important enough to
work on.

http://developer.postgresql.org/todo.php

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2005-03-07 10:44:59 Re: BUG #1519: server closed the connection unexpectedly
Previous Message Peter Wright 2005-03-06 22:47:13 BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause