Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent

From: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Date: 2005-03-02 21:10:18
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:15:54PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
> > Ah, ok.  I've reapplied the 2Q patch to CVS from 20050301:
> >
> > I ran it for 3 hours, just in case, and the charts suggest it flattens
> > out after 2 hours.
> Thanks.  This seems odd though, since it appears to level out at
> something above 4K TPM.  Your previous run
> shows it dropping to 3500 or so.  What changed?

Other than pulling from CVS at a different time, it should all be
the same parameters, etc.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: WesDate: 2005-03-02 21:31:12
Subject: Re: Vacuum time degrading
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2005-03-02 20:17:08
Subject: Re: bitmap AM design

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group