| From: | Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent |
| Date: | 2005-03-01 22:06:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20050301220642.GA3383@osdl.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:57:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
> > About a 6% increase, but if you look at the performance over time,
> > it's degrading steadily. The latter throughput peaks near 5000.
>
> Curious. The immediate question is "does it ever flatten out, and
> if so at what TPM rate compared to 8.0.1?" Could you run the same
> test for a longer duration?
The comparison was against 8.0.1, or did you mean 8.0.1 with the 2Q
patch? I can run a longer duration and see how it looks.
> Also, I suppose the large spike at 30 minutes is from a checkpoint?
Yes, checkpoint_timeout is set to 1800 seconds.
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-01 22:13:06 | Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| Previous Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2005-03-01 21:59:10 | Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |