Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

pgsql: Correct overstatement in locking docs: we said ExclusiveLock is

From: tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Correct overstatement in locking docs: we said ExclusiveLock is
Date: 2005-02-26 18:37:17
Message-ID: 20050226183717.70B8656675@svr1.postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Log Message:
-----------
Correct overstatement in locking docs: we said ExclusiveLock is never
taken automatically, but this is only true with respect to user tables.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/doc/src/sgml:
        mvcc.sgml (r2.46 -> r2.47)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml.diff?r1=2.46&r2=2.47)

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-02-26 18:39:04
Subject: pgsql: Clarify PGPASSWORD usage: ! authentication.
Previous:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2005-02-25 16:13:29
Subject: pgsql: In accordance to http://www.pgsql.ru/db/mw/msg.html?mid=2045361

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group