Re: Call for vote, next meeting location

In spite of scheduling conflicts I had for 2 of the past 2 meetings,
I'll vote for C.

--Craig Addleman

* Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> [2005-02-25 10:17]:
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: sfpug-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Josh Berkus[SMTP:JOSH(at)AGLIODBS(dot)COM]
> > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 10:15:09 AM
> > To: SF PostgreSQL
> > Subject: [sfpug] Call for vote, next meeting location
> > Auto forwarded by a Rule
> >
> Folks,
>
> Early on for SFPUG, we decided to alternate meetings between SF and
> Berkeley/Oakland, because our membership is spread out over the Bay Area.
>
> However, I can't help but notice that attendance at the SF meetings has been
> significantly higher than the Oakland meetings, by a factor of 2, for the
> last year. This is probably because we do not have a meeting location
> within easy reach of BART in the East Bay.
>
> Therefore, I would like to take a vote. Please pick either A, B, C, or D
> below:
>
> A. I will attend the March 9 meeting if it is in San Francisco at Hyperic or
> ShareChive, but NOT if it is at Casa Donde in Oakland.
>
> B. I will attend the March 9 meeting if it is at Casa Donde in Oakland, but
> NOT at a location in San Francisco.
>
> C. I will attend the meeting regardless of location.
>
> D. I will NOT attend the meeting regardless of location.
>
> Of course, if someone offered us a meeting location near BART in
> Berkely/Oakland then this discussion could be mooted. Hey, UCB folks,
> perhaps you could book us a meeting room?
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco