One very small piece of fodder is the flyer I wrote
regarding the Open Source Maturity Model and PostgreSQL.
It highlights the stability of the project.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:32:18AM +0100, Jean-Christophe Arnu wrote:
> Hi folks,
> maybe is this a so long debated subject.. But maybe is it a good
> starting point to refresh all the demonstrations points of PostgreSQL
> advocacy or PostgreSQL-vs-xx arguments. It may be usefull for me (and I
> believe other people here) to be able to argue on various points just
> like the eternal ? what about the responsabilities issues ? ? or ? who
> will be responsible for xxx ? ? (that's my discussion today, but it can
> be another-day/thread for other points).
> While discussing with other IT-people in different country (US, CA,
> FR), the responsability issue is always put on the top of the problems
> of IT-directors each time you talk about PostgreSQL migration. This kind
> of problem is now more sensible than in the past because, from my point
> of view, there is lesser technical problem to migrate to PG now (I mean
> there's plenty of (very good) technical reasons to migrate from an
> another proprietary/opensource database management system).
> The problem is more on the policy side (or ?politics? as we use to
> say in France), and I would like to have some others arguments than,
> just contact a service co. to get some support/responsibility for
> PostgreSQL. Any answer I get back from this arguments is that there's
> _no_ real editor to put the blame (i.e. get money back) on. I'm not
> quite experienced on this field, but I heard a lot of people here in
> France saying that End User License tells users that the editor is not
> responsible of malfunctions or deasaster liable to the software they are
> using. I can argue this, but people still believe that accepting such
> licences give them the ability to lead the editor to the court.
> More generaly, this is an OpenSource question. But PostgreSQL case
> is more sensible from my point of view because, large scale migration is
> about to be done in France (on the country administration side btw) and
> no direction or no project manager wants to handle (or endorse) the
> responsability of PostgreSQL migration or choice (whereas they could
> handle it technically).
> My question is, how can I refine my arguments, do you have others
> arguments I can use? What could we say about responsabilities issue
> regarding to PG? How can I better advocate on PG -more generally- ?
> I hope it won't be an off topic discussion (well, I would'nt post
> this message to -hackers ;) ). Moreover, please "pardon my French".
> Thanks a lot for any answer :)
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
In response to
- FAQ or so? at 2005-02-23 08:32:18 from Jean-Christophe Arnu
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Ken Johanson||Date: 2005-02-23 18:43:03|
|Subject: Re: FAQ or so?|
|Previous:||From: Richard Huxton||Date: 2005-02-23 16:30:33|
|Subject: Re: FAQ or so?|