| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, List pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: UTF8 or Unicode |
| Date: | 2005-02-19 03:35:07 |
| Message-ID: | 200502190335.j1J3Z7S10285@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Dave Page wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
>
> >> Yes, I think we should fix it and remove UNICODE and WIN encoding names
> >> from PG code.
> >
> > The JDBC driver asks for a UNICODE client encoding before it knows the
> > server version it is talking to. How do you avoid breaking this?
>
> So does pgAdmin.
I think we just need to _favor_ UTF8. The question is where are we
favoring Unicode rather than UTF8?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-19 03:35:31 | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-02-19 02:48:49 | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-19 03:58:34 | Re: UTF8 or Unicode |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-18 22:22:37 | Re: WIP: pl/pgsql cleanup |