On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:11:58AM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:57:34AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 03:20 schrieb Michael Fuhr:
> > > Should entries in the Bibliography be updated to reflect new editions?
> > Sure. Please submit a patch.
> Will do. Just wanted to make sure I wouldn't be wasting anybody's
> time by doing so.
Should I update the biblioentry id's, or are they keys that shouldn't
be changed so other documents that refer to them don't need to be
updated? For example, should DATE94 remain the same, or should it
become DATE04 (or DATE2004)? I see that BOWMAN93 refers to a 1996
edition of that book, so I'm guessing the id's should remain untouched.
Just wanted to be sure, though.
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Preston Landers||Date: 2005-02-16 17:30:33|
|Subject: Suggestion for Encodings table|
|Previous:||From: Mark Kirkwood||Date: 2005-02-15 21:02:46|
|Subject: Re: How the planner uses statistics|