Bruce Momjian [2005-02-03 9:42 -0500]:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Uh, if we bump up the major library version in 8.0.X, will that
> > > require 8.0.0 user applications to be recompiled?
> > No, they just keep using the old library.
> That assumes the old libraries stay around. Will they?
> I am thinking the easiest solution will be to re-add get_progname() to
> 8.0.X and bump the major for 8.1.
Seconded. Then we don't need another library version, and it is still
not necessary to drag this get_progname accident forever.
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-02-03 16:02:49|
|Subject: Re: LWLock cache line alignment |
|Previous:||From: Kenneth Marshall||Date: 2005-02-03 15:42:20|
|Subject: Re: LWLock cache line alignment|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-02-03 16:12:16|
|Subject: Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0 |
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2005-02-03 15:34:28|
|Subject: Re: Refactoring lock.c|