Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Our getopt_long() doesn't do abbreviations or NLS

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Our getopt_long() doesn't do abbreviations or NLS
Date: 2005-02-02 09:02:49
Message-ID: 200502021002.52295.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I seem to recall that there was some special consideration for files
> that would conditionally show up in multiple executables.  Or were
> you going to fix that by having just one .mo file for all the
> clients?

The current method is to explicitly register the source file in each 
catalog that might need it.  This is not ideal, but there isn't a 
better way in the works at this time.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mark Cave-AylandDate: 2005-02-02 09:13:12
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2005-02-02 07:27:02
Subject: Re: Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group